By SNV Sudhir
The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), on Thursday, said that
tenders for the proposed port would be finalized by March 2013 and the works
would begin from April onwards.
Though, the Indian Navy’s Eastern Naval Command (ENC),
reportedly raised objections over the proposed port citing security reasons as
a new submarine base is coming up in the vicinity of the proposed site
Rambilli, timely intervention by the district ministers could have made the
difference.
Ports and infrastructure minister, Ganta Srinivasa Rao who
was elected to the Assembly from the district convened an all party meeting in
September and promised to take a delegation to the chief minister to press
their demand for the port at Nakkapalli, but there were no efforts in this
regard.
The present Vizag port is the only major port in the
state though Andhra Pradesh has tremendous potential to handle
foreign trade through sea due to its vast coast line of 996kms. In order
to tap the foreign trade opportunities state government has approached the
union government with a proposal for a second major port when the Centre
announced its maritime agenda for the next decade 2010-20.
Three places were shortlisted for the proposed port, Nakkapalli in Vizag district,
Ramayapatnam in Prakasam district and Duggirajapatnam inNellore district. A high-level central
committee visited the three places in the last six months and the report was
also submitted.
Three places were shortlisted for the proposed port, Nakkapalli in Vizag district,
Ramayapatnam in Prakasam district and Duggirajapatnam in
Later the state government wrote to Centre recommending
Ramaypatnam, which irked the opposition parties.
There were reports that ISRO and the defence officials
reportedly raised security concerns as SHAR is near to Duggirajapatnam and
Nakkapalli is close to Naval Alternative Operations Base (NAOB).
“Nakkapalli is the ideal place having air connectivity too
which is very close to KG Basin and many industries in Vizag. I wonder why Navy
raised objections over Nakkapalli port when they didn’t do to the present port
which is also very close to many establishments of ENC. Another port would help
economic growth in this region” said TD state vice president and former
minister, Bandaru Satyanrayana Murthy.
He accused Minister Ganta Srinivasa Rao of acting in favour
of his native district, Prakasam.
The main opposition TD too which promised an agitation on
large scale was silent since two months and never raised the issue at an
appropriate platform.
1 comment:
Dear Sudhir,
While your apprehensions are acceptable as the port enables rural development, and having well established major city around with naval head quarters, industrially developed isn’t it an over ambitious illusion..?. When the people around Prakasham and Nellore districts are badly in need of finding the industrial growth with necessary infrastructure already available and the PORT enabling attractive investors, it is important for us to see realistic rural development at a large extent.
I have studied in Vizag and very much I believe that the city can cater plenty of career opportunities irrespective of having another port at Nakkapalli. Ramayapatnam is definitely a first choice to establish the new port with the connectivity this has with the Road and Rail and could employee more than thousands we would love to get this going.
Regards,
Srinivas
Post a Comment