By SNV Sudhir
In reply to an RTI query it was revealed that
the PCPIR authorities have not so far consulted the Department of Archaeology
on the location of these archaeological sites and the areas surrounding them
which are to be protected under the Ancient
Monuments and
Archaeological Sites and Remains (Amendments & Validation) Act 2010.
In an attempt to attract global investments in
petroleum sector, union government planned PCPIR in Andhra Pradesh between
Vizag and Kakinada . Accordingly state government formed a special
purpose vehicle- Visakhapatnam- Kakinada Petroleum Chemical Petrochemical
Investment Region Special Development Authority (VK PCPIR SDA) and
a G O 373 was issued in this regard in 2008.
Several archaeological sites dating back to the
1st century BC are in the area notified under PCPIR between Vizag and Kakinada . They form
extremely valuable heritage of the country as well as the region.
Some such sites like Rakasimetta and
Gopalapatnam have been partially excavated, some like Veeralametta, Seetamma
Konda, Boobi Konda, Gudivadametta and Amalapuram have been identified by the department of
archeology, but not yet excavated and some like Peda Uppalam have been surveyed
superficially but yet to be fully investigated. However no thorough
investigation has so far been conducted to identify, classify, excavate and
protect the sites which lie in the area.
As per initial estimates the PCPIR corridor was
to be developed in a total area of 603. 58 sq kms comprising 110 revenue
villages in 10 mandals of both Vizag and East Godavari
districts. Now it has been enhanced by 640sqkms.
State government appointed APIIC as the nodal
agency for development of PCPIR and planning to invest around Rs 19, 031 crores
to provide infrastructure. Government aimed to attract Rs 3.43lakh crore
investments with employment potential of 12 lakhs.
“If the PCPIR goes ahead acquiring land and
setting it apart for use for industry without consulting the department of archaeology,
it is likely that some of the areas protected under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and
Remains (Amendments & Validation) Act 2010 will get encroached upon, in
violation of the Act,” said Rani Sarma, member of INTACH, who filed a petition
under RTI Act with the department of archeology.
She also
filed another petition with the VK PCPIR Special Development Authority (SDA)
seeking if there was any plan to protect these sites for which the reply was in
negative. “The PCPIR authorities should refer
the matter to the Department of Archaeology immediately, have a survey
conducted, identify the ancient sites, and take all measures to protect the
sites before any construction activity takes place in the notified area of
PCPIR,” she added.
No comments:
Post a Comment