Wednesday, November 20, 2013

AP bifurcation: Vizag, Vijayawada vie for new capital, Report suggests Vijayawada

By SNV Sudhir

Visakhapatnam, Nov 20, 2013: In the race for the capital of the residuary state, after Andhra Pradesh bifurcation, Visakhapatnam and Vijayawada stand out to be possible final contenders.

A study conducted by, Delhi based Innovative Transport Solutions (iTrans), an urban transport consultancy, formerly an incubation unit in the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IIT Delhi), in association with a local NGO Vaada Foundation found that these two cities have much better existing infrastructure and have the potential to take in more growth over the future.  iTrans has experts from IIT Delhi.

Vizag, Vijayawada, Guntur, Kurnool and Ongole were assessed by the group for three months and studied the aspects of - existing population and city area, presence of a thriving economy, and regional connectivity i.e. air, rail and road connectivity.

The existing city area of Kurnool and Ongole is very less and hence creating the new capital is like creating a new city altogether, which is not a good choice, said the report. As per the excerpts of the report, which was prepared by Vaada Foundation, accessed by this newspaper, it involves huge land acquisition and investment requirements from the centre if Ongole or Kurnool is considered. 

Interestingly between Vizag and Vijayawada, even though the former has better existing infrastructure and economy, Vijayawada is a city with good connectivity to all the Seemandhra districts including Rayalaseema, said the report. The report suggested and recommended Vijayawada as a best choice for capital as it has access to two national highways, better rail connectivity.

Barring better air connectivity, Vizag, which is almost on the eastern corner of the state scored less on rail and road connectivity to other districts in Seemandhra. The distance from far off areas like Srikakulam, Chittoor, Anantapur and Kurnool districts to Vijayawada-Guntur is around 450 km to 500 km.  And need to develop infrastructure from the scratch has deprived Ongole and out from the race. 

“Presence of a thriving economy is very important because the experience of creating new cities like Gandhinagar, Mohali and Naya Raipur is not very encouraging. It is observed that the development in these cities continues to happen in the nearby old city which has some base development in place. Cities grow organically over a period of time and they can’t be manufactured instantly,” observed Vaada Foundation founder, P Suresh Raju.

The study was recently submitted to the Group of Minister (GoM), appointed by the union government to look into the process of Andhra Pradesh bifurcation.
Vizag and Vijayawada have the required area within the city limits to build the new infrastructure needed for the capital. Vijayawada and Guntur are both part of the Vijayawada-Guntur-Tenali-Mangalagiri Urban Development Authority (VGTMUDA) which has a total of 706 sq. km. 

Between Vizag and Vijayawada, even though Visakhapatnam has better existing infrastructure and economy, Vijayawada is a city with good connectivity to all the Seemandhra districts including Rayalaseema.

Based on this criterion the study suggested that Vijayawada should be made as the capital for the new state being formed. In case the existing area is deemed to be insufficient the VGTMUDA jurisdiction shall be taken up for the capital.  “It is to be noted however that various other factors like physical feasibility etc. have not been considered as a part of this study,” added Raju. 

Earlier the same group submitted another report to the GoM  stating that the Seemandhra government will have to spend at least Rs 2.5 lakh crore to develop a capital city with proper infrastructure.

The earlier report said that a minimum long-term investment of  Rs 2.5 lakh crore would have to be made for the new city.

The most important requirement would be extensive transport facilities like an international airport, road transport and connectivity to all towns and cities of the state. 

Other important infrastructure requirements would be power transmission and distribution grids, backup supply facilities, underground sewerage and water supply lines and solid waste management facilities.

No comments: