By SNV Sudhir
The HZL management stopped production at its smelter unit
since last February and asked its employees to join their mining sites and
various offices located in Uttaranchal, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and
Uadaipur in Rajasthan or opt for Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS).
While few joined their respective postings, majority of them
stared protests since then terming the transfer orders and abrupt
closing of the smelter as illegal. As the deadline for transfers ended on March
11 this year, they have also stopped receiving salaries.
Workers alleged that without any valid reason HZL, in which
Vedanta has nearly 65 per cent stake, stopped production putting their social
security at risk. Since then workers had formed a joint action committee
protesting the moves of Vedanta group.
At present there are around 220 employees who were
protesting at the HZL gate since very long erecting a tent. They have also
erected a tent near the factory and launched agitation since more than 6
months.
Patel said that union government is now holding only 29.53
percent shares in HZL. And there is no provision in the Share Holder Agreement
(SHA) or Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) signed between union government and
Vedanta controlled Sterlite Opportunities and Ventures Ltd (SOVL) at the time
of disinvestment in 2002, to have any say in the affairs of the company and
issue directives to the management.
“Ministry of corporate affairs which was consulted regarding
the powers of the government as a minority shareholder in the company, have
observed that the government can’t intervene in the day to day affairs of the
company,” he said and added that in the absence of any powers under the law
with regard to the day to day affairs of the HZL, it may not be possible for
the government issue directives to the company which may lead to avoidable
embarrassment.
The union mines minister also said that based on the Board
Resolution initiated by a government nominee director, HZL has got a third
party assessment regarding running the zinc smelter plant by L& T. After
detailed examination, the experts technical committee of L & T observed
that ‘based on the observations made during the visit, it is felt that the
present condition of plant is not healthy or safe to run’
However Purandheswari found fault with the report submitted
by L& T. “There is an ample scope
for doubting the impartiality of the L& T as none of the other stakeholders
like state government or employees were consulted. It appears that the
study was silently done to safeguard the interests of the Management at the
cost of the interests of the area and the employees,” she said
Purandheswari further added that even though, being the
minority stakeholder government cannot intervene in day to day affairs but when
it is the larger issue of closure of the Plant and the livelihood of hundreds
of employees and the issue of deindustrialisation of the area, the government
should find the ways and means to intervene.
No comments:
Post a Comment